Qualitative article critique Essay

INTRODUCTION on that point ar a number of accompani workforcetors that head to put inively conducting soft look. It is non except choosing the right electron orbit setting or well-formulated look marvel that counts, but withal the reli king of the evidence and the skills of the audienceer make horrific difference to the outcome of a qualitative query. soft explore involves the scrutiny of societal phenomena.(Gubrium and Holstein 1997, p.11-14). Qualitative tecs look beyond the mundane and try to record how actors register themselves or their world.. Un analogous in quantitative seek, when conducting a qualitative schooling, the investigator is considered as the important instrument for entropy befoolion, selective education analysis, and info interpretation (Paisley & Reeves, 2001). The next few p matures en combine critically analyse the qualitative interrogation denominations of Russell, L. (2005) Its a question of swan match the relationship am ongst students and t from each oneers in ethnographic scene of actionword and Kamenou, N. (2008) Reconsidering Work-Life commensurateness debates Challenging control Understandings of the Life Component in the context of intent of Ethnic Minority Womens Experiences(British ledger of Man seasonment, Vol. 19, S99-S109).Look more(prenominal) than(prenominal)problem description essay1. RUSSELL, L. ITS A motility OF TRUST BALANCING THE RELATIONSHIP among STUDENTS AND TEACHERS IN ETHNOGRAPHIC FIELDWORK.THE AUTHOR IS A YOUNG ETHNOGRAPHER queryING TEENAGERS (P.193). WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES HER AGE gear up?In this particular theatre of operations subject field, the mount up of the ethnographer Russell, L. had both a positive as well as a minus impact on the explore. This field look for was conducted in a pictorialism modal value, this counsel that the investigator inquires the lives and perspectives of the tar established population as accurate as possible in their subjective setting (Gubrium and Holstein, 1997). The questioner Lisa Russell was a young, dilettante, female, white, northerly English ethnographer investigating the sensitive consequence of student resistance (Russell, 2005181). Spradley (1979) refers to ethnography as the run for ofdescribing a culture with the aims to understand another look of life from the insepar fit point of view.To sit more trust and good data of the put upvass culture, the more similarities of signs mingled with the ethnographer and the researched would be an advantage beca exercise this could decrease the differences betwixt them. With this as well, the researcher could prep be herself to adapt to the seat that she would be researching. Lisa Russell has the great advantage of her gender, nationality, use of language, size and age to naturally locomote in as a section of the studied separate, because ethnography relies heavily on notifications of actions and interviews with participant s in naturally occurring situation.My age helped me act on in and indeed understand discussions (p.194). making use of her naivety and young age, her give birth own(prenominal) speechless lust and her figure of organism smallness in altitude and name (p.195), which is not often difference with the teenagers (Lisa mentioned her age is between 23-24 at cartridge clip of researched), these personal traits of the ethnographer has resulted in fundamental interaction and a matter of trust that she has see with the students. Lisa Russell adapted the occasion transaction of abject into least adult role in a different way (p.193).As she recaptures her secondary years were not far-off behind her current phase of life, Lisa was not frightened with certain things she perceived as she was able to relate to her own teaching familiarity during those secondary years when she limn my initiate naivety acted as a pull ahead when trying to manage impulsive and sometimes shocking behav iour of students (Russell, p.182). Age alike contributed to the way students react to the ethnographer along with what he or she is and is not allowed to do (Hammersley and Atkinson, 1983). This characteristic has worked in Lisa favor, as the students mat up unthreatened and therefore more give to express themselves. in addition because shadowing and musing is more reliable and efficient if a researcher is unknown and does not affect the carriage of the steering company.Whereas in this study, Lisas age is at advantage to observe the researched group and efficiently gather data collection, as a young ethnographer she go out face the stickyies of being Lisa being in learnd, since acrucial characteristic of ethnography is the characteristic of ho harkenic which promoter interpreting the data as a whole in order to get a basis for explanation rough the gathered information. Assuming that this is her first research as an ethnographer carrying out a field study, subjectivit y is a terminus ad quem of ethnography. The way ethnographers interpret the field study picture forget vary a lot. at that place is not a set list of answers to choose from but rather the use of notes make by the investigator and ulterior interpreted and categorized by the investigator.The limitation of ethnographic research with reliability is caused by the fact that ethnographic research occurs in natural setting and focuses on handlees (Wiersma 1986 and ruin 1994). The accurate replication is very difficult to achieve because an event in natural setting cannot be reproduced. While reflecting to Wiersma (1986) and destroy (1994) or so the difficulties of accurate replication of findings, Lisas age could be a drawback, because she is a novice ethnographer with limited experience and her abilities to process and evaluate her findings and evidence (interviews, field notes and recordings) could be subjective and a intriguing short letter for a novice.1.2 WHEN IS A investig ator NO LONGER A NOVICE? WOULD HER RESEARCH HAVE BEEN BETTER DONE BY SOMEONE WITH MORE EXPERIENCE?A novice ethnographer is a beginner researcher who just started in the field of ethnography. desire in any other rush function, practice is required to become an good in the field of choice. To make errors and mistakes will contribute to further discretion and deeper knowledge. To my understanding, a researcher is no longer a novice when the ethnographer is able to observe and enroll objectively and subjectively in a field research. additionally the ethnographer should be able to analyze and interpret the gathered data effectively.It is difficult to conclude whether an ethnographer with more experience would see done the research mitigate. When considering the fact that Lisa took the role as a participant as observer (Gold, 1958), she had an advantage of her characteristics my quiet, reserved disposition and smallness in height and build influenced the way students and teachers related to me. I faded into the background. Students would often forget my strawman sometimes teachers and other students mistook me for a student. (Russell, p.195). This shows that disdain that at the time of research, Lisa was a novice researcher she was able to transform herself into the participant as observer role, which gave her find to more insights and reliable information. The researched group and the ethnographer established a matter of trust and even build intense relationships (Russell, p.196). Hence, Lisa was able to collect observation and vision of the researched group.Being a qualitative researcher, one should note the important linkages between theories and methods, reviews key qualitative methodologies, and mettlesomelights challenges and the opportunities (Gephart, 2004). Referring to Gephart (2004), one superpoweriness argue that the research data rating would start out been analyzed and linked better by an ethnographer with more experience. Though in my touch, a more experienced ethnographer cogency not cast been able to collect as much insight as Lisa, because the researched group competency have do differently, so if a more experienced researcher would conduct the field work, I suggest it would be best to do it covertly.1.3 IN THIS RESEARCH PAPER WHAT DO YOU LEARN ABOUT A) THE RESEARCH SUBJECTS AND B) THE RESEARCHER?By critically analyzing the research paper, it informs us that the research subjects were studying at trine different sites, namely two in Birmingham and one in Sydney. As the research affair was to investigate the complex and sometimes contradictory culture(s) of student resistance to discipline (p. 181), students aged between 14-16 were selected c arfully elect by the schools.What is significant or so the researched group is that they were skeptical in the beginning when Lisa arrived it had to be made clear that Lisa would not telling, nor report their behavior to teachers. Names like the follower and leec h suggest that during the sign stages the students did not accept Russell as she fly-by-night them all around. But gradually shemanaged to off one of the most vital aspects of the study trust.The researched group proved trust in Lisa because she witnessed inappropriate and illegal activities, such(prenominal) as damage of school property, thievery and taking drugs. The fact that students did change their behavior means also that Lisa became invisible to the researched group.What we have learned close to the novice researcher is that Lisa used an adaptive approach towards the research and considered how various aspects of her personal disposition bear on her entire study. look forers reflections on their actions and observations in the field, their impressions, irritations, detectings and so on, become data in their own right, forming part of the interpretation, (Flick, 20056) The researchers ability to build relationships and develop rapport with subjects is crucial. (Thorpe & Holt, 2008151)In her article, Lisa repeatedly puts an emphasis on her age and naivety, this shows that these facets of her personal characteristics contributed her to engage in discussions and activities with the students, which if she was old(a) wouldnt have been able to do. Her proximity to their age made it easier for both herself and the students to be able to relate and confide to each other. At the same time it was challenging for Lisa to establish the same bond with the teachers and she felt exceptionally uncomfortable in staffroom conversations. In my opinion, she put a lot of commitment and time into cognizing the narratives and behaviors of the students and failed to do the same with the teachers. up to now when she progressed to the third school her heightened confidence and great experience (Russell, 2005188) made it easier for her to relate to and interact with the teachers.2. KAMENOU, N. (2008) RECONSIDERING WORK-LIFE BALANCE DEBATES . BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEM ENT, 19 S99-S109.2.1 THE AUTHOR APPEARS TO HAVE HAD DIFFICULTIES RECRUITING INTERVIEWEES (SEE ESPECIALLY P.S102). WHY, FOR EXAMPLE, top executive AN ORGANIZATION WITHDRAW FROM THE STUDY CLAIMING RESTRUCTURING WAS IN PROGRESS? (P.102).Qualitative research interview seeks to cover both a real and a meaning level, though it is usually more difficult to interview on a meaning level (Kvale 1996, p.32). Work-life balance means that individuals have in(predicate)ly segmental or integrated life and work so as to achieve a satisfying quality of life, overall expiation and less strain or stock around juggling conflicting role demands. (Blyton et al., 20062). The work-life balance equation (Kamenou, 2008S99) is finding accord between of a number of aspects ranging from career, obligations, family, pastime and culture.In this article, the researcher argues slightly the subject on pagan minority womens experiences of managing their work and personal lives. (Kamenou, 2008S99). Nicolin a Kamenou, gathered data via semi structured, in reasonableness interviews earlier with ethnic minority females. Information of ethnic minority men, white women and white men was also collected as comparability.The researcher faced challenging difficulties in obtaining interviewees still three out of the twenty governing bodys that were invited responded positively to the invitation (Kamenou, 2008S102). Ensuing, one of the three fundamental laws disengaged from the research claiming restructuring was in progress. A research by Spencer (1982) suggests that plaques may restrict access to the organization because they perceive it as a put on the line, which might unwrap their reputation. A possible former of withdrawal of the company is that the research topic is delicate and related to companys policies and perspectives concerning ethnicity, culture, religion and class. By granting insights to these sensitive matters, organizations endanger themselves to harmful publicity to the organizations reputation. A noticeable fact is that the organization that withdrew from the research published and considered themselves attractors in diversity (Kamenou, p.102).Hence, this research subject should be of high interest to the organization. Also cooperation to the research could have been positive publicity assuming that the company indeed was a fiter in diversity. Hence, disengagement of the organization could be a result of abstruse narratives of the company, which are not supposed to be revealed. Forexample, Kamenous article reveals Johns opinions (black Caribbean, Application Manager, Heath Trust, age 34) he did not dress in more traditional clothes because he is scared that his colleagues might be threatened or have issues (Kamenou, p.106).This statement made by John could be interpreted as racism within the company, which consequently could lead to a huge scandal or even a lawsuit. Thorpe & Holt (2008) argue somewhat the importance of sensible consent. Participants in a study should be informed about the research objective, participants rights to confidentiality and namelessness and what will happen to the data and what parties will have access to it. I cerebrate that when multitude or organizations are informed about their rights of informed consent, the number of participants in a study will sum up significantly. The large finance company that withdrew from the research might have participated in the research if they could get anonymity and total fastness that the companies name would not be published.2.2 WHAT are THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PEOPLE IN ORGANIZATIONS WHERE baronial ACCESS HAD BEEN GRANTED AND THE INDEPENDENT root word?Kamenou (2008) invited 20 organizations, of which 2 organizations accepted to participate. Additionally she invited independent groups from personal networks so that involvement of subjects from different sectors, qualifications and occupations could enrich the data. Each group would have t heir own various inputs to the research, and data could be more valid. Personal networking is seen as one of the best ways to get granted access to an organization Carr and worthy (2001). The main obstacle about evening gown access to an organization is that there might be a matter where companies make the employees not to unveil certain information about the company or the narratives in the organization. Subsequently there is a high possibility of fear, where the employees do not inadequacy to disclose information that could threaten their jobs.However, if the brass were that the employee was an acquaintance of the researcher, there would have been confidentiality between the researcher and the interviewee, which would make the interviewee more open and honest during the inquiries. According to Spradley (1979), people who feel comfortable, safe, and valued are more extraverted thanthose who are only considered as sources of information. in that location is definitely a diffe rence between the interviewed groups, in particular the data malodorousness and disclosure of information between the people in organization where formal access had been granted and the independent group determine through personal networking (Kamenou, 2008, p.s102).Qualitative research interviews partly consist of open-ended questions, this allows the interviewer to question and inquire further on the answers and likewise, interviewee can share thoughts and experiences. Kamenou (2008, p.s103) argues that the semi structured, in depth nature of interview conducted with all participants allowed them the time and space to reflect and discuss their experiences in their own words (Harvey, 1990 ODwyer, 2005) and helped to surmount possible bendes in the research process.2.3 WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE AUTHOR? HOW might THE IDENTITY OF THE AUTHOR HAVE do A DIFFERENCE TO THE RESEARCH?In the article the author doesnt describe herself, neither does she mention on how she could have influen ced the research. The article is different from Russells ethnography paper, which accentuates strongly on personal observation and self-reflexivity but less on the statistical information. Analyzing her own processes during the fieldwork, Lisa claimed the researcher should employ a reflexive attitude to understand how the interaction between the researcher and the researched, and the researchers autobiography, influence the data collected (Russell, p. 197). The individuality and background of the author does have an effect on the research outcome, involving in what is called observers bias. Observers bias is referred to as the aspect to where the researchers know the objectives or the hypotheses and consequently their knowledge affects the observations and gathered data. base on the understanding of the researcher about the issue, they will absorb the observations and interviews in which they are interested. It is also likely that researchers unintentionally coiffe what they obser ve from the participants, and mold it to their own perspectives. Therefore, the potence risk is the possibility of misunderstanding or failure to present the accurate perceptions and opinion of participants about the research subject. A way to decrease observers bias and to overcome the risk ofrevealing misinterpreted data is to use additional observation methods such as imposture experiments, tape records, and multi-observers. Using these extra tools during the field study could be used as evidence of validity or reused as secondary data for another study. cultivationAfter critically analyzing both articles of Russel (2005) and Kamenou (2008), I have learned that qualitative research adopts different and various knowledge claims, research strategies, and methods of data collection and analysis. If the research processes are handled carefully it could provide a deeper understanding of the research topics. Qualitative analysis compiles the study of perception, meanings, emotions and behavior, which aim to present original, truthful insights about various human and cultural phenomena. By studying the papers and participating in the seminars, I gained insight and knowledge about the difficulties and challenges faced when carrying out a field study. The various external and internal influences have a crucial impact on qualitative studies and should not be underestimated.The article by Russel (2005) shows us a research conducted by a novice ethnographer, with accentuate on the uncertainties and challenges of her research. Contrast to Russells article, Kamenous article provides readers with her observations, interviewees view and personal life experience, the various responses and the causes of such behavior. I can conclude that both articles are both very interesting and significant. disdain the fact that there were some errors made during both studies, there is no headstrong guideline of how to conduct a successful qualitative study. In a way we will always tr y to understand the unknown, even though it is obvious that every individual has its own unique behavior and perspectives.BIBLIOGRAPHYBlyton, P., Blundson, B., Reed, K., & Dastmalchian, A. (2006) _Work-Life Integration International Perspectives on the rapprochement of Multiple Roles_, 1st ed. New York PALGRAVE MACMILLIANBurns, R.B. (1994). _Introduction to Research Methods._ Melbourne Longman Cheshire.Carr, E., Worth, A. (2001) _The use of telephone interviews for research. Nurse research 6_ 511-525.Flick, U., (2005) _An Introduction to Qualitative Research_, 2nd ed. capital of the United Kingdom SAGEGephart, R.P. (2004) _Qualitative research and the_ _Academy of counsel Journal_, _Academy of Management Journal_, 47 (4), 454-462.Gold, R. L. (March, 1958) _Roles in Sociological champaign Observations, Social Forces_, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p217Gubrium, J.F. & Holstein, J.A. (1997) _The impudently language of qualitative method_. New York OxfordHammersley, M. and P. Atkinson (1983), e thnography _Principles in Practice_, capital of the United Kingdom and New. York Routledge, page 2, 72 77.Harvey, L. (1990). _Critical Social Research_. London Unwin Hyman.Jensen, Klaus B & Nicholas.W. Jankowski (1991) _Handbook of Qualitative_ _Methodologies for locoweed Communication Research_. London RoutledgeKamenou, N.(2008) _Reconsidering Work-Life Balance Debates._ British Journal of Management, 19 s99-s109Kvale, S. ,(1996) ,_Interviews An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing_, Thousand Oaks, CA sensible Publications,Paisley, P. O., & Reeves, P. M. (2001). Qualitative research in counseling. In D. C. Locke, J. E. Myers, & E. L. Herr (Eds.), _The handbook of counseling_ (pp. 481-498). Thousand Oaks, CA salvia.Russell, L. (2005) _Its a question of trust balancing the relationship between students and teachers in ethnographic fieldwork._ Qualitative Research Vol. 5 (2) 181-199Spencer, G. (1982) _Methodological issues in the Study of Bureaucratic Elites a theatri cal role study of West Point. In Burgess, R.G. survey Research a Sourcebook and Field Manual_. London George Allen & Unwin.Spradley, J.P. (1979). _The Ethnographic Interview_. New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Thrope, R. Holt, R. (2008) _The sage dictionary of qualitative management research._ Thousand Oaks, Sage PublicationsWiersma, W. 1986. _Research Methods in Education An Introduction._ Newton Allyn and Bacon.